Skip to main content

Navigating Genres

Meghan Hawk
Navigating Genres


Throughout "Navigating Genres" by Kerry Dirk, she explores genre conventions and what it means to adhere to a specific genre, both benefiting and complicating. Dirk personally addresses her concrete audience: college students. By establishing who the readers are, she takes on a conversational tone and even states that she is acting more of a coach, rather than from a third person or impersonal standpoint. This in itself forms its own genre. Collectively as college students we now know what to expect from Dirk--that she is attempting to generate a new response to our take on how we perceive genre. Dirk makes note of "everyday genres" in headlines, which is something in my experience I have not considered to be a genre. However, after reading how The Onion uses it's comedic one-liners to grab their audience and make them laugh, I can see how she came to the realization that these too can be considered genre. Something else that I felt I related to was the general thesis statement and the "rules" that come along with writing them. High school was filled with numerous papers with mandatory theses that felt like a formula. Writing according these algorithms doesn't allow for variation in structure and in truth feels quite constricting. Dirk admits that these often lead her to "very bad writing", and of course, I don't blame her.

Comments

  1. I can relate very much to your statement about the general thesis statement and the rules that follow them because we were taught all through elementary school to high school to use them. After writing those required essay I found myself never being proud of them because I wasn't able to write how I truly wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked the fact that Dirk's writing was so conversational, like you said, and it is a genre in itself. I also had never thought of everyday genres before this reading, and it just shows how vast the concept of genre is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you pointed out that Dirk was speaking to college students and therefore changed her rhetoric. And I agree with what you said about the "formula" of writing and that it leads to poor writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree about the rules and formulas that high school had us follow when we write, and how that doesn't always help papers, but sometimes makes them worse due to the restrictions. I also liked her example of The Onion!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...