I understand that companies want to copyright there products to keep people from stealing their ideas and possibly redistributing themselves. However, for someone to not allow home videos online because of a song seems a little outrageous. I believe the idea of copyright was thought of more for money reasons than it was for the protection of one’s individual creation. I think interpretation and “remixing” or incorporating one’s work should not only be accepted but appreciated. Well, when the original author is given credit anyways. I think remixing is a form of flattery and a form of the audience responding and appreciating one’s work…
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
Comments
Post a Comment