The reading was about copyright issues and how to try to avoid them. Many artist copyright their work so that no one comes along and takes their idea and makes money off of it. Many artists take thus Very seriously so one must be cautious when trying to come up with something. If you want to grab ideas from a certain artist you have to make sure that you give credit to the author or creator, or else they could get mad. One example is the mother who posted the video of her child dancing to a Prince song and got sued for it. The lawsuit is probably a little ridiculous but that is how serious some artist take their work. The mother probably just wanted everyone to see her cute baby and probably could’ve gotten away with it if the video didn’t become viral or if another artists song was playing. This is how serious some artist take copyright issues, however if you give them credit and say that it is some sort of a remix than it should be fine.
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
Comments
Post a Comment