His chapter helped me understand what to do in project three. It showed me how a multi genre project is created. First one must come up with a rhetorical topic for ones project. Once the writer has an idea for their topic they must create an elaborate title to grab the readers attention. Then the writer must make the project stand out with editing and making the page look nice so that the reader is intrigued by the project itself. I will aim to do this in my project three so that people are interested in it.
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
I agree! The chapter definitely helped me to better understand what project 3 is about and the examples were interesting to look at.
ReplyDelete