Earlier this week, I was completely confused as to what exactly my task was for project 3. Thanks to my peer review, I have gained a better understanding of what I am suppose to do for project 3. I had only developed the un-digital subversive genre remediation, which were five memes. My peers recommended I do a twitter page and a survey for the other two genre remediations that I am required to do. I plan on developing my twitter page on gun control and for it to be active as long as possible. I also plan on informing twitter users of my topic. My subversive un-digital memes will remain the same because it captures the attention of my audience, which are students who support gun control. I will make the questions I input into my survey opinion based, so that I can see how students feel towards gun control and how they feel making current gun regulations stricter will impact the number of mass shootings we have in the United States in the future.
My writing process for project 2 was different from project 1 because I had to conduct research towards my argumentative topic. I also was required to use the Florida State university database in order to find peer-reviewed article that would provide me with correct information. This essay also had several sources whom mad me sound more credible towards my audience, which enabled me to write more about my topic. The personally think that writing a first draft and then revising it in order for it to be my final draft to be very helpful when writing a research essay. I was able to carefully go over any grammatical or punctuation errors as well as make sure that all my sentences made sense and were not random. I enjoyed project 2 the most because I was required to conduct research on my topic, which allowed me to expand my knowledge towards an argument that is personal to me and it made me sound even more credible when discussing this argument face to face with someone.
Comments
Post a Comment