- The annotated bibliography assignment made the writing process for project two slightly simpler. For project one I did a shitty first draft and had to later piece it all together. I would say that two was easier because of the bibliography as well as participating in the Dinner Party assignment which made my ideas flow together better.
- I think that transferring the first draft to a final draft is most productive for me. My first drafts are always really messy, and the final draft is more elaborate and has a flow of ideas. I can cut out and add where it’s needed and have more direction. I also develop new ideas from my original ones and make my points stronger.
- Project two was more enjoyable for me because I was passionate about the topic. My first project was extremely rushed and I had no connection to the narrative. Project two was interesting to read about, and I feel as though I gained valuable information from it.
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
Comments
Post a Comment