Skip to main content

Mock Annotated Bibliography

Meghan Hawk
ENC 2135

Ayhan, Gulen, et al. “Suicide Risk among Prisoners in French Guiana: Prevalence and Predictive
Factors.” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1320-4.


The author argues that France has had the highest suicide rates in prison amongst 15 European countries. With this said, the author disputes that the French overseas territory, French Guiana, has never had conducted research studying the suicide risks and its' predictors. The research question attempts to answer the causes and exposures of suicide in the only prison located in the penitentiary centre of French Guiana. In order to measure the predictive factors of suicide rates, the 707 inmates were given the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). The MINI is a proven valid diagnostic test for psychological disorders, following the criteria  of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV).  The results showed that among the prisoners, 13.2% had a suicidal risk; 14.0% high risk, 15.1% moderate risk, and 41.9% low risk (Ayhan). Among these the predictive factors consisted of "depression, dysthymia, panic disorder, general anxiety disorder, men having been abused during
childhood, having been sentenced for sexual assault, and smoking" (Ayhan 1). To conclude, the risk
of suicide in French Guiana was lower than the mainland France. Additionally, the main predictors of
such risks almost all involved psychiatric disorders, stressing the importance of diagnosis and treatment.

Comments

  1. It is good, as it has all the things it needs: thesis, background information, quotes, and a conclusion. The only thing is that it’s a little long, but that’s an easy thing to fix.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...