Skip to main content

Chapter 6--MK

Mary Katherine Rankey

This chapter was all about evaluating and choosing sources. The book discusses that there are numerous types of sources. One type is a general source. General sources are written by experts for non experts and help everyday people understand the basics of certain topics. Another type of source is an academic source. These sources are written for those who are members of the academic community by those who are very specialized in the topic at hand. Typically I find myself reading general sources the most and only really read academic sources when i'm writing a research paper. The chapter also talks about evaluating a source. You can evaluate a source by verifying the credibility of the website itself, the author of the source, and wether the author cites sources or not. This chapter reiterated a lot of what I already knew about choosing valid sources, however it allowed me to gain a greater insight on types or sources.

Comments

  1. I too will be using academic source when writing my research paper as well as general source!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that general sources will be used mostly when writing our research paper and this reading also let me learn a lot more about choosing a credible source.

    ReplyDelete
  3. General sources are probably what I use more on a daily basis when I do things like Google search questions. As I write this research paper, I'm going to have to use academic sources as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A lot of verification in the reliability of sources can come from databases where one can limit their search to peer reviewed articles and journals to avoid the hassle of trying to decide yourself if it is credible.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...