Skip to main content

Annotated Bib. Brain Regions

Desmet C, van der Wiel A, Brass M (2017) Brain regions involved in observing and trying to interpret dog behaviour. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182721.


Desmet, van der Wiel, and Brass research the human brain regions that are involved in mentalizing animal behavior. Their goal of their work is to find out if the same brain regions that are involved in mentalizing human behaviors are the same regions “engaged when observing dog behavior” (1). The idea of this research stems from the prior extensive research of the brain correlations of mentalizing human to human interaction. The study focuses on three major questions: does the strength of brain activation vary with observations that are easy versus difficult to interpret; if there is a potential difference, is it amplified when instructed to reason with dog versus passive observation; does the human’s prior experience with dogs effect the activation pattern? In order to go about their research, the authors gathered data from 17 total participants, 8 of them were dog owners and 9 of the participants did not have a dog. The data collected were the brain scans during passive task, interpretation task, and localizer task. The author’s concluded that there are indeed regions of the brain that are more responsive to dog behavior that is difficult to interpret compared to behavior that is easy to interpret. In addition, they concluded that dog ownerships did not “yield a statistically robust influence on the involvement of the mentalizing system when observing dog behavior” (12).  

Comments

  1. Overall, I think that this annotated bibliography was done properly

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Bedford Book of Genres

Throughout chapter 1 of “The Bedford Book of Genres,” I learned that there are a variety of ways to improve one’s writing. Several writers tend to get carried away while writing that they forget who their audience is and what message they are trying to deliver. This is when one must ask themselves what their purpose of writing is, do they want to present a narrative/ tell a story, inform, or persuade. After figuring out ones purpose they must choose a genre to be able to shorten their idea and be concise. In order for this to occur one must know the basic qualities and agreed-upon rules about the genre they are composing. Once one makes those decisions they move on to the rhetorical situation which mainly explains the idea. This allows the writer to provide support on their purpose such as saying what is great about it or provide statistics, which will automatically make their writing more interesting for the audience to read, as well as, get t...

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.