Desmet C, van der Wiel A, Brass M (2017) Brain regions
involved in observing and trying to interpret dog behaviour. PLoS ONE 12(9):
e0182721.
Desmet, van der Wiel, and Brass research the human brain
regions that are involved in mentalizing animal behavior. Their goal of their
work is to find out if the same brain regions that are involved in mentalizing
human behaviors are the same regions “engaged when observing dog behavior” (1).
The idea of this research stems from the prior extensive research of the brain
correlations of mentalizing human to human interaction. The study focuses on
three major questions: does the strength of brain activation vary with
observations that are easy versus difficult to interpret; if there is a
potential difference, is it amplified when instructed to reason with dog versus
passive observation; does the human’s prior experience with dogs effect the
activation pattern? In order to go about their research, the authors gathered
data from 17 total participants, 8 of them were dog owners and 9 of the
participants did not have a dog. The data collected were the brain scans during
passive task, interpretation task, and localizer task. The author’s concluded
that there are indeed regions of the brain that are more responsive to dog
behavior that is difficult to interpret compared to behavior that is easy to
interpret. In addition, they concluded that dog ownerships did not “yield a
statistically robust influence on the involvement of the mentalizing system
when observing dog behavior” (12).
Overall, I think that this annotated bibliography was done properly
ReplyDelete