Skip to main content

The Bedford Book of Genres: Chapter 1

As humans, we all have our preferences and prefer one thing over another. We talk a specific way and we have our own distinct characteristics that define who we are in all aspects of our lives. This is similar to authors and their compositions and writings, who have to specifically target down the reasons behind the work they compose and their audience in order to have a larger impact. Authors make these decisions to better communicate with those who are listening, to tell a story, to educate and inform, or maybe even persuade. Rhetorical appeals are used to get these messages across to the audience to provide credibility and to be relatable. I have learned about ethos, pathos and logos, but I never understood their purpose, but I now see how they bridge the gap between the author and the audience. The author has more decisions to make when composing something than I ever knew, but it is necessary to be efficient to get the point across effectively. The platform, or mode, for example, is another choice made to identify with their distinct audience by choosing the appropriate way to communicate. Style is a very distinct characteristic that authors can be identified by, for example, Ernest Hemingway's style is lengthy, descriptive, and artistic in his language. The tone can make the difference between formal and informal depending on the subject matter and the audience. I admire the amount of dedication it takes to compose a piece from start to finish, when most of the planning is done before the writing has even begun.

Comments

  1. Megan, I loved that you drew the connection that ethos, pathos, and logos "bridge the gap between the author and audience. I have never appreciated the amount of work it takes to create a perfect paper, I know see how this chapter helps you build and plan one's paper to make it "perfect."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really agree with what you said about ethos pathos and logos bridging the gap between the author and the audience. These three writing styles definitely make it easier to sort of make that connection with the author that is so necessary in order to either enjoy or retain information form a piece of writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...