Skip to main content

Really Responding

Syvannah Boland

A. This text surprised me because it truly captured how peer editing should be versus how people peer edit in reality. Straub captured the main flaws in most people' peer editing work, and it was a shock that most people do the bare minimum instead of actually being productive and helpful to others when reading their papers.
B. Yes I do. I think focusing on fixing the issues based off of what we learn in class is a good way to critique someone's paper. Straub also mentioned to be critical, but supportive and constructive as well. I think these are great pointers when it comes to giving feedback, because it improves the paper without making the other person feel bad about their work. 
C. I have peer edited in the past, and it honestly has been a negative experience. I basically only did it for the grade and gave comments that weren't very thorough or helpful. I gave people the benefit of the doubt because I didn't want to make them feel bad for making mistakes, and that is something Straub specifically says not to do. I want people to be helpful with my writing so I can improve, so this shed light on how I should be more helpful when I participate in peer editing. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Writing Activity March 27, 2018

My writing process for project 2 was different from project 1 because I had to conduct research towards my argumentative topic. I also was required to use the Florida State university database in order to find peer-reviewed article that would provide me with correct information. This essay also had several sources whom mad me sound more credible towards my audience, which enabled me to write more about my topic. The personally think that writing a first draft and then revising it in order for it to be my final draft to be very helpful when writing a research essay. I was able to carefully go over any grammatical or punctuation errors as well as make sure that all my sentences made sense and were not random. I enjoyed project 2 the most because I was required to conduct research on my topic, which allowed me to expand my knowledge towards an argument that is personal to me and it made me sound even more credible when discussing this argument face to face with someone.
5 comments
Read more

The Bedford Book of Genres

Throughout chapter 1 of “The Bedford Book of Genres,” I learned that there are a variety of ways to improve one’s writing. Several writers tend to get carried away while writing that they forget who their audience is and what message they are trying to deliver. This is when one must ask themselves what their purpose of writing is, do they want to present a narrative/ tell a story, inform, or persuade. After figuring out ones purpose they must choose a genre to be able to shorten their idea and be concise. In order for this to occur one must know the basic qualities and agreed-upon rules about the genre they are composing. Once one makes those decisions they move on to the rhetorical situation which mainly explains the idea. This allows the writer to provide support on their purpose such as saying what is great about it or provide statistics, which will automatically make their writing more interesting for the audience to read, as well as, get t...
5 comments
Read more

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.
Post a Comment
Read more