Skip to main content

Navigating Genres

Sophia Fundora

Towards the beginning of Navigating Genres, Kerry Dirk highlights that genres used to mean form and simply just filling in the blanks. To be completely honest, when it comes to pieces of writing, I have always thought that to be the golden rule. Whenever I read something that strayed away from the typical expected norms from a certain genre, I applauded it for breaking the boundaries that were apparently never really there to begin with.
Dirk wrote that genre theory has progressed since the time when genres were just seen as predetermined structures with blanks to fill in. She refers to a piece rhetorician Lloyd Bitzer wrote on how new genres are created all the time from new events that require the creation of a response. Essentially, it's the idea that every situation elicits a new and/or different response. As Bitzer puts it, genres are developed through the appropriate responses to similar situations being seen, heard or read repeatedly. Dirk uses George Washington's first State of the Union Address as an example for this since he had all the freedom to structure his piece however he wanted and pave the way.  Since that was the first ever presidential address, all the presidents that have came and will come after it follow that same exact (or similar) structure.
Dirk also highlights the importance of rhetorical situation when talking about genres. Dirk pointed out that we use rhetorical situation in our every day lives. When ever I draft a tweet or send someone a funny picture, I do it with an expected outcome of what the person or the people online seeing my tweet are to say and how they are to react. News and article headlines do this all the time, using a rhetorical action that elicits that specific response they are looking for, which is why Dirk classifies them as their own genre as well. Overall, I think Dirk really put it in to perspective and was able to show me, the reader, that although genres have rules, they are always changing and writers themselves are the catalyst for change.

Comments

  1. I also enjoyed how Dirk used George Washington's state of the union address as how he created a genre that is still used to this day. I think this example was a good way of Dirk showing us how genres apply to every writen work and how certain texts such as a tweet or an union address has certain features that are expected to be seen within these works.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...