For my second draft, I am definitely going pull out my main point from my first draft and organize them into separate paragraphs. Now, that I understand the project better I know what to write about so, I can come up with better examples and ideas in my paper. The peer review really helped me see what I can do to improve my paper by bringing up topics that never occurred to me. Lastly, I want to make my introduction paragraph a lot more grasping to the readers and add a thesis statement because I feel like it summarizes what the paper will mostly discuss.
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
Comments
Post a Comment