Skip to main content

Bedford Reading Response

After reading chapter one, I learned that in order to be a successful writer you have to think like the author. You have to read their their text carefully and find out how they make their writing work depending on their genre. Also, before you begin writing you should make sure your purpose is clear, so you can find the best genre for getting your point across to your audience. Although, you are always writing to an audience, the audience may not always be the same. Therefore, you have to think about who you are writing to and how you address your purpose to meet their expectations. For example if you are writing a paper for class, you are going to want to use big vocabulary words, rather than small vocabulary when writing for a younger audience such as children. This chapter was very useful for me because it helped me understand the main components of writing such as the rhetoric appeals, ethos, pathos, and logos. For future papers, I'll definitely refer back to this chapter because it contained a lot of information that could help me when I'm writing my papers.

Comments

  1. I agree that knowing your audience is very important and that one may have to change their appeal in order to help the audience understand.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As an author, you have to be precise and accurate in who you are communicating with and with the message. As an audience member, you should be able to understand the motives behind the writing through his or her rhetorical appeals. I agree that there is more involved than just words on a page.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...