Skip to main content

Bedford Book of Genres Reading Response

Rocio Nicot
ENC2135
January 10, 2018


The spectrum that writing sits on is much broader than most know - without even beginning to take into account how times have changed and are continuing to change how an audience is spoken to. The specific talk of modes within genres caught my attention, and how older pieces are changing in the way that they are being presented to an audience - whether that be the many different forms of audio, or visual that exist today. Many older pieces, such as Annie L. Burton's memoir, were written with one mode in mind - and are now being shared in ways that were not taken into consideration during their inception. With how quickly technology changes, there are different perspectives that need to be accounted for before going forward with a published piece. The audience plays one of the largest rolls in writing, and is proven to be a major point of focus in this chapter. The style of a piece can determine what type of audience is being targeted, and how the syntax used will keep the reader interested. The use of rhetorical appeals is predominantly based on the same idea of focusing on the audience, and how they will be persuaded. The use of ethos, logos, and pathos can help give shape to an idea – and how that idea needs to be portrayed. Trying to play on a reader’s empathy in the wrong context can be cause for confusion, and can ultimately result in a loss of interest. 

Comments

  1. I was definitely interested in the changes in modes overtime. Technology has to be changing the ways people put out their work. I think it's really important to have the right modes and media when putting put new pieces.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

For my action plan I will add more pictures to my website and continue to expand on my topic. I also plan to make posters to place around campus to reach outside audiences and use that as my nondigital source. I will continue to work over the weekend to finish the project and best carry out my message on my website.

Rachel Klahm 3/27/18

1) In project two I first did a lot of research to gather ideas and topics that I wanted to include in my essay. Then I went through and proofed it while adding citations and formatting everything. I did ended up doing three drafts rather than two. Project one was a little easier to write in my opinion because it was based off of our observations rather than facts and statistics. 2) I liked taking my first draft and transforming it into a final draft. This is where I organized all my thoughts and made the paper flow nicely. Once I have all my ideas out on the paper I can easily reorganize, cut and add new things. 3) I enjoyed project one more. I think it was lighter in the sense that it was more fun to write about. I liked exploring the different kinds of social adaptions in the films while also comparing time eras.

"Really Responding"

Sophia Fundora  The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...