Skip to main content

BBG 261-276

Syvannah Boland
After reading this section of the book, it made me realize what I was doing right and what I was doing wrong in the past when I researched things. I had always followed the basic rules, such as making lists of topics, doing preliminary research, etc. What I had never thought to do that the chapter suggested was things like talking to other people, free writing, and mind mapping. The pictures that they provided made these strategies seem very useful and effective. I also agree with their suggestion to avoid topics that are too "out there" because those can be hard to write about objectively. When I was reading, I was either agreeing with points they made because they were things I already do when researching, or taking mental notes on new tricks to implement the next time I do. Something I never really thought about that the book mentioned was if I actually enjoyed the topic myself. I've always chosen topics that I thought were scholarly and sophisticated rather than topics I was truly interested in. I also like how they support changing the wording of the research question as you work, making it more relevant, and more specific. It shows that there is room for fixing errors and gave me some relief that I'm supposed to be changing things as I go to improve.

Comments

  1. I always have never thought to change the way I research prior to reading this chapter. Next time I do a research project, I am going to try something other than just searching on Google. So like free writing, and mapping.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also never thought to talk to others about my topic, free write, or mind map. Similarly, I also would stick to topics that sound more scholarly, but now I will definitely try one I am genuinely interested in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am also going to try out free writing and mapping for my future papers because I have never tried to do this before and feel as if it will be very helpful. I also never ever thought to talk to others about a topic and I will start doing so because sharing ideas and thoughts with other people can be helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that this chapter gives good advice on how to approach a paper, and I plan to use strategies like free writing, mind mapping, and talking to others to excel in future writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wysocki

This text showed me how us as readers perceive a certain font or text and how it can influence our mood and how we feel about a certain reading. It also showed me how elaborate texts can draw us into something such as a poster or a title page of a book. Also how very bland fonts do not appeal to many readers as they might think of it as boring and plain. This gives me a lot to think about as project three comes closer. It makes me think of the reader and what type of fonts might draw them into my website, social media page, etc. This text was very helpful for this type of assignment.

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...