For my second draft I will go into greater detail about the differences between the two genres and give more specific examples. The peer review allowed me to see where my faults were in the first draft. Going into the second draft, not only will I include more detail, but I will also fix any grammatical mistakes. I will make this draft more organized and use more concepts we learned in class. To finish my second draft off, I want to make a better and more organized conclusion to my paper! I will do so by better summarizing the whole paper instead of just having the paper end without a summary as I did in my first draft.
Sophia Fundora The text "Really Responding" surprised me in the way that Richard Straub claimed that putting forth maximum effort when peer reviewing someone else's paper could make you an even better writer. He emphasizes the importance of writing comments within the margarines and summarizing the paper in your own words. I believe that this strategy mentioned could be very helpful not only for the person who's paper your reviewing but for yourself as well. It helps the writer see how the audience would perceive their paper and what they need to work on. It helps the reviewer by enhancing their comprehension skills and applying their own comments on their own paper as well. I also believe his strategy of taking the stage of drafting in to consideration when peer reviewing could be very helpful. For example, Straub mentions how if it's a first or rough draft, try not to deal with all the editing at once but instead focus on the large picture like the focus, con...
Comments
Post a Comment