Before reading the remix introduction, I rarely ever focussed on copyrights. The article mentioned many cases of copyright issues that seem ridiculous. Sometimes people don't mean to do it, like the mother in the article. She just wanted to share a video of her son dancing to her family, but in the end she was sued $150,000 by Prince. Personally, I thought this was an overreaction. The mother was just sharing a video of her son dancing to a Prince song in the background. However, this just reminds people how important it is to give the original creators credit for their work, to avoid consequences like this. Even though many new ideas are originated from previous ones, credit should still be given to the owners because the new idea was based off the original one.
Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.
Yes I agree the example with the mother is an overreaction. The reading does emphasize how important copyright laws are.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you 100%, Prince's reaction towards the mothers video post on Youtube was an overreaction. I also believe that this reading definitely emphasized the importance of copyright laws.
ReplyDeleteI agree that some of the copyright issues were ridiculous and that most people don't even realize they are doing it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said about the copyright being an overreaction. Im sure the mom wasn't aware of the consequences of posting the video with the prince track.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that the reading really made me realize how important copyright laws are, and how they are taken very seriously.
ReplyDelete