Skip to main content

Remix Reading

Reading "Remix" made me realize how serious large companies take copyright issues. I had no idea that a mother who downloaded a video on Youtube of her 18 month baby dancing to Prince's song could get sued for $150,000 because the video is classified as a copyright. She simply just downloaded the video because she thought it was funny and cute, she had no idea it could be viewed as copyright. Another example, a girl making a project about what goes into becoming a celebrity got sued because she used a picture of John Lennon in her project and it was considered copyright. I believe these are all unintentional copyrights, meaning individuals are not aware that those actions/ideas could be interrupted as copyrights. I think that if one wants to include the works of an artist in another form of their own entertainment, they should give the artist credit because the individuals "own" idea did after all derive from the previous artists idea. The author Lessig did not only provide readers with several examples of copyright situations between singers and people using their music as entertainment, but also compared copyright laws of other countries.




Comments

  1. Megan HellerApril 17, 2018 at 8:39 AM

    Even innocent mistakes like that of the mother in the example can potentially hurt an artist monetarily, which is why copyright exists. It is fairly common in the modern world, therefore, as you said, credit should always be given to avoid this issue.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.
Post a Comment
Read more

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...
1 comment
Read more

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.
1 comment
Read more