Skip to main content

Chapter 6

Megan Heller

When writing research reports to support an argument, it is important to back up your argument with credible and reliable resources. When we want a question to be answered, we typically turn to Google and use Wikipedia or Yahoo Answers. However, you do not know who wrote the answers to the question or topic and you do not know if these answers are completely accurate. It is important to use sources written by experts in that particular field of research. For example, my research paper is about how different societies influence the diagnosis and treatment of psychopathy. This research is strictly psychology, and I would have to use resources such as databases that hold psychological journals and articles written and peer reviewed by psychologists and psychiatrists. Therefore, I can be sure that the information I obtain is credible. Other forms of reliable sources may be primary sources, as this information is direct, however it is important to always examine possible biases. These can be prevalent in secondary sources, such as newspapers, and sometimes even published articles. By using peer reviewed sources it eliminates most traces of a bias.

Comments

  1. I agree that the credibility of the source is most important, and having credible sources also makes it easier to write.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.