Skip to main content

The Bedford Book of Genres: Chapter 1

As humans, we all have our preferences and prefer one thing over another. We talk a specific way and we have our own distinct characteristics that define who we are in all aspects of our lives. This is similar to authors and their compositions and writings, who have to specifically target down the reasons behind the work they compose and their audience in order to have a larger impact. Authors make these decisions to better communicate with those who are listening, to tell a story, to educate and inform, or maybe even persuade. Rhetorical appeals are used to get these messages across to the audience to provide credibility and to be relatable. I have learned about ethos, pathos and logos, but I never understood their purpose, but I now see how they bridge the gap between the author and the audience. The author has more decisions to make when composing something than I ever knew, but it is necessary to be efficient to get the point across effectively. The platform, or mode, for example, is another choice made to identify with their distinct audience by choosing the appropriate way to communicate. Style is a very distinct characteristic that authors can be identified by, for example, Ernest Hemingway's style is lengthy, descriptive, and artistic in his language. The tone can make the difference between formal and informal depending on the subject matter and the audience. I admire the amount of dedication it takes to compose a piece from start to finish, when most of the planning is done before the writing has even begun.

Comments

  1. Megan, I loved that you drew the connection that ethos, pathos, and logos "bridge the gap between the author and audience. I have never appreciated the amount of work it takes to create a perfect paper, I know see how this chapter helps you build and plan one's paper to make it "perfect."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really agree with what you said about ethos pathos and logos bridging the gap between the author and the audience. These three writing styles definitely make it easier to sort of make that connection with the author that is so necessary in order to either enjoy or retain information form a piece of writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.