Skip to main content

Shitty First Draft Response

Katherine Kumpf
ENC 2135
Anne Lamott goes into detail about the importance of first drafts when writing essays. She explains how she knows some amazing writers, and how they write terrible first drafts at times and end up with amazing pieces of writing. Lamott writes "The right words and sentences just do not come pouring out like ticker tape most of the time". By saying this emphasizes the idea that it takes time to get the right sentences. Great writers take a lot of time to make sentences flow together to make a piece of literature. She explains how she wrote her food reviews when she worked for the magazine in California. She states how the first draft is known as the childs' draft. In the first draft you just write a bunch of stuff down, just to write something. This draft also tends to be a lot longer than the final product. She says to write down everything on the first draft, just in case there is something amazing surrounded by lots of bad writing. She tells the audience how she edits her second draft, by eliminating anything bad, or irrelevant to the topic. This article is significant because it shows how the best pieces of writing can evolve from the worst first drafts. It encourages young writers to not worry about having a well written first draft. 

Comments

  1. The idea of a first draft can be very intimidating, and you help with the understanding that a shitty first draft can help more than it can hinder. Explaining the process she goes through as she edits her drafts also helps give more strength to this discussion, showing the audience an overview of what is to be expected when writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.