Skip to main content

Shitty First Drafts Response

After reading Anne Lamott's article "Shitty First Drafts", my previous ideals of turning in a clean, prestige, and polished first draft are over. Lamott shares her own experiences as a writer, along with the frustration and defeat that comes with brainstorming and the lead. Similarly, I and many others share these same feelings. She gives great insight and simplifies first drafts to a T. They are nothing more than the writer's every thought and idea splattered onto the paper, non-organized and messy. Lamott reminds us that it is acceptable to turn in works like these. For almost all of my life, I have had such a concrete mentality of perfection on every occasion--even on first drafts. If I had not polished my draft before turning it in, all I could think of was each mistake that I had made and how I would be critiqued for it. However, Lamott sheds light on common misconception of "perfect" first drafts and encourages writers to lay their ideas on the page, free from repercussions. Overall, I find this article very useful and it has definitely changed my writing techniques and strategies.

Comments

  1. Like you, I myself mistakenly valued the importance of perfection of the first draft. Instead of just laying my ideas out on the table, I made it harder for myself by attempting to completely edit my original ideas all at once. I too will encourage myself to change my writing techniques.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can relate to formerly striving for perfection in first drafts, and now that I think of it, doing that only makes the editing process more difficult since there is less to work with. I agree that Anne Lamott provided great insight on first drafts, and it has changed my personal writing techniques as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Similar to you, I made sure my first drafts were as perfect and polished as possible. This article has also changed my view on first drafts. Making sure the first draft is perfect caused a lot of stress and reduced the amount of time we could have used organizng our writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely relate to dealing with the stress and struggle of turning in a rough draft that I wanted to be perfected and finished so I wouldn't have to fix more in my later drafts. It gave me a lot relief to read this and know that I am not the only one who deals with this, and that a perfect rough draft is never expected. It's good to know that I can just throw unorganized ideas down and it is considered complete.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.