Skip to main content

Rocio Nicot 'Shitty First Drafts'

ENC2135
Shitty First Drafts


Anne gives a view on writing that most often than not, is a stance most people would feel ashamed of. Getting stuck while writing is beyond frustrating – and can have even the best writers feeling hopeless. Starting this discussion was a good example for me, and how a ‘Shitty First Draft’ would definitely benefit me in this situation. Anne shows you how relatable this issue is, and how letting your mind flow free at first may help reign in some amazing points - that can lead to an even stronger piece as a whole. She gives an example of this by explaining how out of 5 or 6 pages of gibberish, she can pull a phrase or two that will help the rest of the review flow – it might spark some creativity. As Anne takes you through her process of writing a review, she writes about how her first drafts were always her largest embarrassment, even playing on the idea of her suicide if it ever saw the light of day. This helps lighten up the mood, and even shows the audience how much work is needed to make a strong paper, or book. This idea of a ‘Shitty First Draft’ helps me realize how easy it is to give up on something that doesn’t seem solid, or strong, at first and how often that act alone can keep a great thought from coming to light.

Comments


  1. Juan Marturet
    ENC 2135


    In Anne Lamott’s book “Bird by Bird” she stresses how when writing that people should make at least three drafts before publishing. The first draft, which is called the shitty draft, is meant to write down all the ideas one might have to get them on paper before it is forgotten. The second draft is to clean it up and make sure that you are getting your message across. The third draft is to perfect your work and to make sure there are no grammatical or small errors. Lamott says that this is the key to writing a good paper. I would agree with her as one must look over their work over and over to make sure that it is the best that they can do. It can also help someone become a better writer as they start to realize errors in their writing in which they can correct through revision.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.