Skip to main content

Really Responding

Syvannah Boland

A. This text surprised me because it truly captured how peer editing should be versus how people peer edit in reality. Straub captured the main flaws in most people' peer editing work, and it was a shock that most people do the bare minimum instead of actually being productive and helpful to others when reading their papers.
B. Yes I do. I think focusing on fixing the issues based off of what we learn in class is a good way to critique someone's paper. Straub also mentioned to be critical, but supportive and constructive as well. I think these are great pointers when it comes to giving feedback, because it improves the paper without making the other person feel bad about their work. 
C. I have peer edited in the past, and it honestly has been a negative experience. I basically only did it for the grade and gave comments that weren't very thorough or helpful. I gave people the benefit of the doubt because I didn't want to make them feel bad for making mistakes, and that is something Straub specifically says not to do. I want people to be helpful with my writing so I can improve, so this shed light on how I should be more helpful when I participate in peer editing. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.
Post a Comment
Read more

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...
1 comment
Read more

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.
1 comment
Read more