Skip to main content

really responding

Alison McGrath
ENC 2135

The assigned reading portrays the idea of putting more effort into responding, peer revision, and the paper you're revising. The author wants the reader to not just look over the paper, but to fix the paper.
1) When reviewing a paper, I always glance through quickly once, to get an idea of the writing, as suggested in "Really Responding." I also try not to focus solely on one area, and try to help with revisions throughout the piece.
2) A new piece of advice I can take away from this chapter is not to leave short comments. In the past I have left small little comments, as to not offend the writer. Yet, as pointed out in the chapter, it's about responding to the writing, giving back constructive criticism so that the writer excels. Longer comments are better, because they actually help the writer, while little comments do little to get the writer to fix their work.
3) Peer revision in the past has not always been the most helpful, due to the lack of authentic comments. Usually, when peer reviewing many focus on grammar, or other easy things to fix (myself included). Sometimes it helps, but most often it hasn't, and i think that's because of the way we were originally taught to peer review.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.