Skip to main content

Really Responding

Jacqueline Kulle
Really Responding

1. "Really Responding" surprised me because it provided many beneficial ways to peer review someone else's work. It taught me to explain my comments, be clear, etc. This article has helped me learn more on how to be a better peer reviewer.
2. Yes, I think the strategies in this text can help in peer reviews. One strategy that stuck out to me is to not be short and sweet when making comments. As a reviewer, you have to leave detailed remarks, giving the writer ways to improve his or her paper. Leaving unclear and short messages will not benefit the writer in any way. Leaving detailed feedback gives the writer more to work with, and will help them improve their work. Another technique this article explained was how to present your comments on a writer's work. Asking questions and offering advice will be very beneficial to the writer. It is also to explain the reasoning for your comments, so they may want to change their paper based on the reading you provide.
3. Yes, I have done peer review in the past. The past experiences have been positive. I enjoy trying to help others improve their writing and others look over mine and give me advice. It turns out to be beneficial to everyone, and I think it is good to get a second opinion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.