Skip to main content

Navigating Genres

Sophia Fundora

Towards the beginning of Navigating Genres, Kerry Dirk highlights that genres used to mean form and simply just filling in the blanks. To be completely honest, when it comes to pieces of writing, I have always thought that to be the golden rule. Whenever I read something that strayed away from the typical expected norms from a certain genre, I applauded it for breaking the boundaries that were apparently never really there to begin with.
Dirk wrote that genre theory has progressed since the time when genres were just seen as predetermined structures with blanks to fill in. She refers to a piece rhetorician Lloyd Bitzer wrote on how new genres are created all the time from new events that require the creation of a response. Essentially, it's the idea that every situation elicits a new and/or different response. As Bitzer puts it, genres are developed through the appropriate responses to similar situations being seen, heard or read repeatedly. Dirk uses George Washington's first State of the Union Address as an example for this since he had all the freedom to structure his piece however he wanted and pave the way.  Since that was the first ever presidential address, all the presidents that have came and will come after it follow that same exact (or similar) structure.
Dirk also highlights the importance of rhetorical situation when talking about genres. Dirk pointed out that we use rhetorical situation in our every day lives. When ever I draft a tweet or send someone a funny picture, I do it with an expected outcome of what the person or the people online seeing my tweet are to say and how they are to react. News and article headlines do this all the time, using a rhetorical action that elicits that specific response they are looking for, which is why Dirk classifies them as their own genre as well. Overall, I think Dirk really put it in to perspective and was able to show me, the reader, that although genres have rules, they are always changing and writers themselves are the catalyst for change.

Comments

  1. I also enjoyed how Dirk used George Washington's state of the union address as how he created a genre that is still used to this day. I think this example was a good way of Dirk showing us how genres apply to every writen work and how certain texts such as a tweet or an union address has certain features that are expected to be seen within these works.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Action Plan

Jacqueline Kulle The peer review helped me a lot for my action plan and gave me more ideas and insight on what I should do. I was struggling with what I should do for my subversion, and I got the idea to do a meme or a comic strip. I have to finish and touch up my website, finish my nondigital picture, finish my comic strip, and get more participants for my survey. The peer review was beneficial and now I have a much clear idea on how I should do this project.

Subversion and Redemption. Rachel Klahm

1. Some subversion examples the author mentions are Max in  Where the Wild Things Are and Don Quixote. Other movies that are subversions are  A Haunted House and WALL-E. WALL-E is a subversion because it's a light hearted cartoon with a much deeper meaning. Humans have abused planet Earth with industrial corporations to the point where they must abandon it until robots have cleaned it up. The moral lesson is that technology and industry are bad and if we continue on the path we're on, the Earth will turn into the trash ridden world that is in WALL-E. Despite this, the film is still pro-human. Compared to the usual "humans are bad for nature" lesson, WALL-E  actually shows why Earth needs humans. The movie has no real dialogue from anyone, just robot sounds and intercom voices on the ship that the humans live on. When WALL-E   meets Eva they ask each other "Directive?" which basically means "What's your purpose?" Each robot in the film has a dir...

Mary Katherine Rankey annoying ways

The reading "Annoying Ways" is all about the annoying ways people choose to use their sources and the things they can do to change those quirks. The reading discussed the proper ways to cite sources and to cite quotes that the writer uses in their paper. The reading also discusses the importance of where to put a quote. Often times I find the perfect quote, but put it in an awkward place in the sentence, which not only makes my work more sloppy, but also takes away from the message of the quote. The author uses a lot of analogies in his writing to explain how the annoying ways of improper uses of quotes can mimic annoying things in real life. The reading taught me ways I can fix my writing style to fix those annoying habits I have.